Request For Comments (RFCs)
  • Request for comments (RFC)
  • RFC 001: Matcher architecture
  • RFC 002: Archival Storage Service
  • RFC 003: Asset Access
  • RFC 004: METS Adapter
  • RFC 005: Reporting Pipeline
  • RFC 006: Reindexer architecture
  • RFC 007: Goobi Upload
  • RFC 008: API Filtering
  • RFC 009: AWS account setup
  • RFC 010: Data model
  • RFC 011: Network Architecture
  • RFC 012: API Architecture
  • RFC 013: Release & Deployment tracking
    • Deployment example
    • Version 1
  • RFC 014: Born digital workflow
  • RFC 015: How we work
    • Code Reviews
    • Shared Libraries
  • RFC 016: Holdings service
  • URL Design
  • Pipeline Tracing
  • Platform Reliability
    • CI/CD
    • Observability
    • Reliability
  • RFC 020: Locations and requesting
  • RFC 021: Data science in the pipeline
  • RFC 022: Logging
    • Logging example
  • RFC 023: Images endpoint
  • RFC 024: Library management
  • RFC 025: Tagging our Terraform resources
  • RFC 026: Relevance reporting service
  • RFC 026: Relation Embedder
  • RFC 027: Pipeline Intermediate Storage
  • RFC 029: Work state modelling
  • Pipeline merging
  • RFC 031: Relation Batcher
  • RFC 032: Calm deletion watcher
  • RFC 033: Api internal model versioning
  • RFC 034: Modelling Locations in the Catalogue API
  • RFC 035: Modelling MARC 856 "web linking entry"
  • RFC 036: Modelling holdings records
  • API faceting principles & expectations
  • Matcher versioning
  • Requesting API design
  • TEI Adapter
  • Tracking changes to the Miro data
  • How do we tell users how to find stuff?
  • Removing deleted records from (re)indexes
  • RFC 044: Tracking Patron Deletions
  • Work relationships in Sierra, part 2
    • Work relationships in Sierra
  • Born Digital in IIIF
  • Transitive hierarchies in Sierra
  • RFC 047: Changing the structure of the Catalogue API index
  • RFC 048: Concepts work plan
  • RFC 049: Changing how aggregations are retrieved by the Catalogue API
  • RFC 050: Design considerations for the concepts API
  • RFC 051: Ingesting Library of Congress concepts
  • RFC: 052: The Concepts Pipeline - phase one
  • RFC 053: Logging in Lambdas
  • RFC 054: Authoritative ids with multiple Canonical ids.
  • RFC 055: Genres as Concepts
  • RFC 055: Content API
    • Content API: articles endpoint
    • Content API: Events endpoint
    • Content API: exhibitions endpoint
    • The future of this endpoint
  • RFC 056: Prismic to Elasticsearch ETL pipeline
  • RFC 57: Relevance testing
    • Examples of rank CLI usage
  • RFC 059: Splitting the catalogue pipeline Terraform
  • RFC 060: Service health-check principles
  • RFC 060: Offsite requesting
    • Sierra locations in the Catalogue API
  • Content-api: next steps
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Background
  • Problem Statement
  • Proposed Solution
  • Process flow

RFC 005: Reporting Pipeline

PreviousRFC 004: METS AdapterNextRFC 006: Reindexer architecture

Last updated 10 months ago

Last updated: 02 November 2018.

Background

The collection aggregates data from a number of sources:

  • Archival records

  • Library systems

  • Digital asset metadata

Data will flow from these systems into our data store.

Problem Statement

In order to make decisions about collection data.

We need to run analytics and reporting on data from various sources.

Proposed Solution

We propose to add a simple reporting pipeline powered by lambda functions feeding an ElasticSearch cluster.

Process flow

The event stream from the SourceData "Versioned Hybrid Store" triggers:

  • A lambda which performs a custom transformation on source data making it suitable for ingest into elasticsearch.

    • This lambda will pass a json object and index identifier to SNS

  • An ingestion lambda PUTs the object passed to the specified index

It is intended that there may be multiple transformation lambdas, providing custom transforms. There will be one ingestion lambda intended to try and PUT any object to any index specified.

Ingestion Lambda proposed message format

The ingestion lambda needs to take a message that configures which index to attempt to add the object to.

{
  "index": "my-index-1",
  "object": {
    "foo": "bar"
  }
}

Elasticsearch mappings

It is not intended that strict mappings will be provided. It will instead be the job of the transformation to provide representative data.

Note: is unsuitable for this purpose at time of writing as it is incapable of performing ElasticSearch document updates.

Kinesis Firehose
overview